Go Back   This Blue Marble, a Global Current Events Discussion Forum > Main Floor > Politics

Politics Step up and make your case on all manner of political topics.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 05-25-2011, 09:58 AM   #1
jason
Official Peon
 
jason's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,053
Thanks: 25
Thanked 290 Times in 183 Posts
Default Rand Paul preventing patriot act from passing

For the past seven hours, Senator Paul has been holding the Senate floor to keep the senate from passing the patriot act without debate or amendments.

http://dailypaul.com/165765/for-the-...e-senate-floor
jason is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2011, 10:08 AM   #2
Greta
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,302
Thanks: 172
Thanked 25 Times in 23 Posts
I was reading the comments from the link. Someone wrote below comment. I am wondering myself too what "holding the senate floor" means.
Quote:
If anybody knows what actually Rand is doing, please illuminate the masses here.

Thanks in advance!

I mean, is Rand standing at the pulpit and refusing to yield, and he has this right? Or what specifically is he doing?

Sounds heroic, and I appreciate it, just want some understanding.
Greta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2011, 11:07 AM   #3
Twoolf
Searcher for Truth and a good Carpachio
 
Twoolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: West Central Florida
Posts: 4,680
Thanks: 851
Thanked 719 Times in 456 Posts
A filibuster is a type of parliamentary procedure. Specifically, it is the right of an individual to extend debate, allowing a lone member to delay or entirely prevent a vote on a given proposal. It is cynically referred to as talking out a bill,[1] and characterized as a form of obstruction in a legislature or other decision-making body.
The term "filibuster" had been in use for centuries to refer to independent military operators.[2] The term was commonly used in the 1840s for American adventurers who sought to seize power in Central America. The term in its legislative sense was first used in 1854 when opponents tried to delay the Kansas-Nebraska Act in the U.S. Congress.[3]

from Wikipedia
__________________
----------------------------------------------------------
Men rarely (if ever) manage to dream up a god superior to themselves. Most gods have the manners and morals of a spoiled child. R.A.H.

“The Government of the United States of America is not in any sense founded on the Christian religion.”
~1797 - John Adams

Our Gods are dead. Klingion Warriors slew them eons ago. They were more trouble than they were worth. Worf
Twoolf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2011, 01:13 PM   #4
Sysiphus
Senior Level 5
 
Sysiphus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Seattle
Posts: 6,522
Thanks: 109
Thanked 419 Times in 285 Posts
A filibuster only works if you have 40% supporting you so that the rest can not bring cloture (i.e., cut off the filibustering speaker). When a cloture petition is presented, the speaker is literally interrupted on the floor (or at least used to be).
Sysiphus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2011, 01:28 PM   #5
MDINMT
Member Level 4
 
MDINMT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: NW MT
Posts: 530
Thanks: 704
Thanked 104 Times in 59 Posts
http://politics.blogs.foxnews.com/20...past-rand-paul

We didn't think they didn't have a plan,did we?
MDINMT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2011, 01:57 PM   #6
leistb
Senior Level 6
 
leistb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 8,637
Thanks: 357
Thanked 748 Times in 418 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by MDINMT View Post
http://politics.blogs.foxnews.com/20...past-rand-paul

We didn't think they didn't have a plan,did we?
Eff Harry Reid... What's changed, Harry?

In the a$$hole's own words... (complete statement at the link)

Quote:
December 16, 2005



FLOOR STATEMENT OF SENATOR HARRY REID ON REAUTHORIZATION OF THE USA-PATRIOT ACT

“I supported passage of the original PATRIOT Act in 2001, which was enacted in the days immediately following the vicious attacks of September 11, 2001. I do not regret that vote. Much of the original Act consisted of non-controversial efforts to update and strengthen basic law enforcement authorities. More than 90 percent of the 2001 Act is already part of permanent law and will not expire at the end of this year.

“But we are currently considering renewal of those provisions that were considered so expansive and so vulnerable to abuse that Congress wisely decided to subject them to four-year sunsets. The authors of the Act wanted Congress to reassess these authorities in a more deliberative manner with the benefit of experience. Now, more than four years later, we are presented with an opportunity to get it right.

“While the conference report before us makes certain improvements over the original PATRIOT Act, it still does not strike the right balance. We can provide the government with the powers it needs to investigate potential terrorists and terrorist activity and at the same time protect the freedom of innocent Americans. Liberty and security are not contradictory.

“Additional congressional and judicial oversight of the government’s surveillance and investigative authorities need not hamper the government’s ability to fight terrorism. These checks are needed to ensure that the government does not overreach or violate the privacy of ordinary American citizens who have nothing to do with terrorism.

“I am convinced of the need for such checks based in part on information I learned from a Washington Post story that ran in early November, after the Senate had passed its bill. The story reported that the FBI issues more than 30,000 national security letters a year. Chairman Specter says that number is not accurate, but even if half as many letters are issued each year, Congress must act to ensure appropriate protections.

leistb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2011, 05:03 PM   #7
Ought Six
Dismember
 
Ought Six's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 35,164
Blog Entries: 15
Thanks: 178
Thanked 390 Times in 326 Posts
Arrow

__________________
* I have the right to live, thus I have the right to defend my life from attackers who would take it from me.
* I have the right to my private property, thus I have the right to defend my property from thieves who would take it from me.
* I have the right to self-determination, thus I have the right to defend my liberty from tyrants who would take it from me.
* The only usable tools for these tasks are guns, and thus I have the right to shoot anyone who would take my guns from me.
Ought Six is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
act, passing, patriot, paul, preventing, rand

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.