Go Back   This Blue Marble, a Global Current Events Discussion Forum > Main Floor > Science Center > Power Station

Power Station A wing of the Science Center dedicated to the discussion of energy issues. This includes both technical and political discussions of current and future conventional and renewable energy issues.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 03-19-2009, 05:07 PM   #1
Sonny
Senior Level 3
 
Sonny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 3,803
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: 159
Thanked 107 Times in 90 Posts
Default Shell dumps wind, solar and hydro power in favour of biofuels

Shell dumps wind, solar power for biofuels
Web posted at: 3/19/2009 8:45:35
Source ::: THE GUARDIAN


LONDON: Shell will no longer invest in renewable technologies such as wind, solar and hydro power because they are not economic, the Anglo-Dutch oil company said today. It plans to invest more in biofuels which environmental groups blame for driving up food prices and deforestation.

Executives at its annual strategy presentation said Shell, already the world’s largest buyer and blender of crop-based biofuels, would also invest an unspecified amount in developing a new generation of biofuels which do not use food-based crops and are less harmful to the environment.

The company said it would concentrate on developing other cleaner ways of using fossil fuels, such as carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) technology. It hoped to use CCS to reduce emissions from Shell’s controversial and energy-intensive oil sands projects in northern Canada.

The company said that many alternative technologies did not offer attractive investment opportunities. Linda Cook, Shell’s executive director of gas and power, said: “If there aren’t investment opportunities which compete with other projects we won’t put money into it. We are businessmen and women. If there were renewables [which made money] we would put money into it.”

Shell said biofuels fitted its core business of providing fuels, logistics, trading and branding. Cook added: “It’s now looking like bio*fuels is one which is closest to what we do in Shell. Wind and solar are interesting [but] we may continue to struggle with other investment opportunities in the portfolio even with big subsidies in many markets. We do not expect material investment [in wind and solar] going forward.”

The company also confirmed that it would increase its dividend payments this year by about 5 percent to $10bn.

Friends of the Earth (FoE) criticised Shell for freezing investment in renewables such as wind in favour of biofuels. “Shell is backing the wrong horse when it comes to renewable energy – biofuels often lead to more emissions than the petrol and diesel they replace,” the campaign group said.

Until recently, Shell’s investment in wind power featured prominently in its corporate advertisements. FoE said the company’s move heralded a slightly more honest approach. “Shell is at least being a bit more honest about the fact they are a fossil fuel company. It has seen the limitations of the greenwash it was putting out a few years ago.”

Shell has about 550 megawatts of wind farm capacity around the world, enough to power a city the size of Sheffield when the wind blows. Last year, it pulled out of the 1,000MW London Array project, the joint venture to build what would be the world’s largest offshore wind farm, in the Thames Estuary. Former project partner E.ON has yet to decide to continue with the £3bn investment needed.

Outgoing chief executive Jeroen van der Veer admitted that the company had suffered some “technology baths” in the past when it backed unprofitable technologies. “We don’t do it [renewables] all.”

The company has predicted that by 2025, 80 percent of energy will come from fossil fuels and 20 percent from alternative energy sources. Yet it is spending just over 1 percent of its budget on alternative technologies. Over the past five years, only $1.7bn of the $150bn it has invested has gone towards alternative energies.

Cook pointed out that at one stage the company only invested 1 percent of its budget on liquefied natural gas, which is now a big part of its business. “You have to start somewhere,” she said. Van der Veer also admitted that Shell’s overall R&D budget would “fall a bit” as the company focused on the most promising technologies and in the wake of the oil price slump.

The company said it would raise debt levels to maintain dividend payments and its spending programme. Van der Veer insisted that energy demand in the long term was strong and oil prices would recover. “The problem is you don’t know when the long term starts.”

http://www.thepeninsulaqatar.com/Dis... 031984535.xml
!
__________________

--Thomas Jefferson, 1743-1826--

"I place economy among the first and most important virtues, and public debt as the greatest of dangers. To preserve our independence, we must not let our rulers load us with perpetual debt."
--

Last edited by Sonny; 03-19-2009 at 05:13 PM.
Sonny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2009, 06:20 PM   #2
Ought Six
Dismember
 
Ought Six's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 35,164
Blog Entries: 15
Thanks: 171
Thanked 389 Times in 325 Posts
Arrow

The only biofuel crop I can imagine being economically and ecologically viable is a strain of algae or something they can grow in tanks, without using massive amounts of farmland.
__________________
* I have the right to live, thus I have the right to defend my life from attackers who would take it from me.
* I have the right to my private property, thus I have the right to defend my property from thieves who would take it from me.
* I have the right to self-determination, thus I have the right to defend my liberty from tyrants who would take it from me.
* The only usable tools for these tasks are guns, and thus I have the right to shoot anyone who would take my guns from me.
Ought Six is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2009, 10:06 PM   #3
Potemkin
Omne ignotum pro magnifico
 
Potemkin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 20,841
Blog Entries: 3
Thanks: 45
Thanked 761 Times in 532 Posts
It is all feel goof bullstuff.

I heard someone where today they can hardly give away hybrids now. They said there is a 80 days supply of Prius.

How soon we forget.
__________________
Socialism is the philosophy of failure, the creed ignorance, and the gospel of envy; its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.
Winston Churchill
Potemkin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2009, 02:15 PM   #4
dharma
balrog
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 4,057
Thanks: 201
Thanked 380 Times in 222 Posts
The morals of our story:

1) As much as biofuels suck, wind power and solar power suck even more.

2) Fossil fuels are it for the foreseeable future (hmmm, I believe I've heard that somewhere before . . .)

3) Nukes!

4) Corollary to the above: Obama, Chu, the majority of Congressional Democrats, and most "environmentalists" are dolts who can't do simple arithmetic.
dharma is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
biofuels, dumps, favour, hydro, power, shell, solar, wind

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.