Go Back   This Blue Marble, a Global Current Events Discussion Forum > Health and Medicine > Flu Clinic

Flu Clinic A special wing of TBM's Health and Medicine forum set aside for discussing all issues related to influenza, pH1N1, H5N1 or seasonal. Please use the subrooms as appropriate.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 07-10-2016, 10:23 PM   #1
CanadaSue
SuperModerator
 
CanadaSue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: In my gardens or online
Posts: 35,508
Blog Entries: 28
Thanks: 2,486
Thanked 11,047 Times in 5,057 Posts
Post Flu shot effectiveness for 2015-16 disappointing, data shows

Some really interesting information provided in this article & near the end it very much affirms Catbird's post from a short time ago about the now known deficiencies with the FluMist formulation:

***It's the time of year when experts crunch the numbers to see how well the flu shot worked. The result? Better than last year, but still not good enough.

"Overall, just shy of 45 to 50 per cent," said Dr. Danuta Skowronski of the BC Centre for Disease Control, who presented the data to the Global Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness meeting at the World Health Organization last week.

"That's lower than we would like to see, but it's an improvement over the previous year, because it couldn't be worse, frankly"

In 2014-15, the flu shot offered essentially zero protection against the circulating influenza virus of that season. Back then, the prevailing strain was H3N2.

This year's main circulating virus was H1N1, which flu watchers will remember from the pandemic of 2009-10.

Skowronski said the vaccine was well-matched, but overall, the protection was disappointing.

"We would like to see it higher than 50 per cent," she said. "Previously we have measured H1N1 protection closer to 60 or 70 per cent, so we would like to know why now it's lower."

Experts used to believe the annual flu shot protection was much higher, around 70 to 90 per cent. But not anymore. Those early estimates were based on industry-funded clinical trials that were extrapolated to apply across all ages and flu seasons.

"It was a blanket assumption that is simply not true," Skowronski said.

That assumption changed dramatically, after Skowronski and colleagues developed a protocol that revealed the true picture of vaccine efficacy. It's called the test negative design (TND) first piloted in Canada in 2004.

"The test negative design has opened our eyes to all kinds of variables that we were blind to for years. We were flying blind," said Skowronski.

The TND system tracks people who show up with flu-like symptoms at several hundred doctors' offices across Canada. Doctors take a sample from every patient for lab testing. They also record whether the person got the flu shot. That simple protocol reveals how often the flu shot fails.

In April, The Lancet published a meta-analysis of test negative design studies, now used globally, and cited Canada as the pioneering group.

"It is no exaggeration to say that the TND has transformed our understanding of the variability in influenza vaccine protection — by season, by subtype, by age group, by vaccine product," said Skowronski.

The good news is the data is more reliable. But the bad news is that experts now realize the flu vaccine protects only about half of the time.

"Our public health goal is to minimize the serious health problems association with the flu," said Skowronski. "There's no use promoting a vaccine that isn't working well. The only way you can do better is to recognize the problem in the first place."

This year's data also shows that only about a third of Canadians got the flu shot, about five per cent less than last year.

"That's not a surprise coming out of a year where effectiveness was so low. That had to have an impact," said Skowronski.

Scientists also once again observed the paradox that previous vaccination against the flu seemed to lower protection.

The so-called "Canadian problem" was first identified by Skowronski's team during the H1N1 pandemic.

So far, scientists have not been able to explain why people who get the shot with no prior vaccine exposure seem to have better protection than people who get the shot year after year.

This year's Canadian data also reveals a trend, observed in the U.S., that the flu mist vaccine is not working.

The mist, made with a live, but weakened virus, was originally believed to be more effective in children and less upsetting than getting a needle.

But last month a U.S. expert panel advised doctors to stop using it, after it performed poorly for three years in a row.

As for a recommendation about whether people should still get the flu shot if it's only working half the time, Dr. Skowronski said it is strongly recommended for elderly people and for those who are immunocompromised.

"For people at high risk of serious complications of influenza, like hospitalization or death, the stakes can be especially high. For them, a 50 per cent reduction in risk compared to if they had not been vaccinated is a very important." she said.
"They are strongly recommended to receive the vaccine."...***


http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/canada...h1n1-1.3669427
__________________
Searching for a dream to run after & catch!
CanadaSue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2016, 10:01 AM   #2
A.T. Hagan
Your "Crazy Town" reporter
 
A.T. Hagan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: North/Central Florida
Posts: 12,688
Thanks: 2,770
Thanked 6,923 Times in 2,963 Posts
Yes, it was. My whole family was vaxxed, but my wife and I both came down with the flu anyway.

There should be a law that BOTH parents cannot be sick at the same time!
__________________
Chance favors the prepared mind.
A.T. Hagan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2016, 09:04 PM   #3
Antropologo
Skeptically Inquisitive
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: The "Free" State
Posts: 1,247
Thanks: 467
Thanked 1,029 Times in 412 Posts
I'm never, ever getting a flu shot again - the Big Pharma companies put some seriously toxic crap into those "vaccines". The last time I got one, it put me in the hospital for three days to get immunoglobulin transfusions.
Antropologo is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Antropologo For This Useful Post:
Dude111 (07-12-2016)
Old 07-12-2016, 07:25 AM   #4
WVDragonlady
Working on it
 
WVDragonlady's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: West Viriginia
Posts: 632
Thanks: 45
Thanked 630 Times in 236 Posts
I never get the shot.I was forced to as a kid but never got one as an adult. I've had the flu 3 times in my life. Seems like people get the flu every year or at least thats what they call it. Not sure if it really is the flu or just a bad cold. I had one of those 2 years back. Had everything but a fever so I knew it wasn't the flu just a bad cold. Now-a-days people sneeze and they have the flu even tho they don't go to the doctors to find out for sure.

Seems to me that the shot never covers the flu that is making the rounds. Its always wrong

Good hygiene along with removing yourself from people who insist on going out among others when sick works good for me. I'm obsessive about clean hands, using sanitizer until I can get home and use soap and water.
And I've just upped and walked out of stores when people are hacking and coughing on people. I've actually yelled at people to cover their mouths when they're spewing germs all over. They don't like it but too damn bad, stay the hell home then
WVDragonlady is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to WVDragonlady For This Useful Post:
Dude111 (07-12-2016)
Old 07-12-2016, 07:15 PM   #5
Dude111
An Awesome Dude
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 663
Thanks: 455
Thanked 137 Times in 82 Posts
Vaccines are awefull... They mess up your nature immune system and leave you vulnerable to OTHER THINGS later in life you might not get..... (Auto immune diseases,etc)


I have an auto immune disease I DO BELIEVE was caused by the crap vaccines I used to get when I was younger... (Before I knew how bad they are)

Last edited by Dude111; 07-13-2016 at 05:12 AM.
Dude111 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
data, disappointing, effectiveness, flu, shot, shows

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.