Go Back   This Blue Marble, a Global Current Events Discussion Forum > Main Floor > Politics

Politics Step up and make your case on all manner of political topics.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 12-30-2009, 03:50 PM   #1
Ought Six
Dismember
 
Ought Six's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 35,164
Blog Entries: 15
Thanks: 171
Thanked 389 Times in 325 Posts
Arrow Fingerpointing Begins in Aftermath of Failed Terror Attack



Intelligence and diplomatic officials have crouched into defense mode in the wake of the failed Christmas Day terror attack, as lawmakers start to point fingers and the administration bellows that the president demands "accountability."

The first congressional call for a head to roll came Tuesday from Rep. Dan Burton, R-Ind., who demanded the resignation of Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano, citing what he said was her "bizarre" claim Sunday that the "system worked." But Napolitano has survived calls for her ouster before, and an administration official said the president "absolutely" has confidence in her.

President Obama declared Tuesday that a "systemic failure" allowed the suspect in the failed attack to carry explosives onto a plane bound for Detroit, and he signaled that his review will dig deep into the many warning signs that were missed at multiple levels of the federal bureaucracy.

"The warning signs would have triggered red flags and the suspect would have never been allowed to board that plane for America," Obama said.

Within hours of his remarks, new information trickled out about who knew what, and when. And it didn't look good for some agencies.

An intelligence official told Fox News that one piece of information appeared to be available that would have allowed the National Counterterrorism Center to potentially elevate the suspect's name on a terror database. Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab was in a terror database of more than a half-million people, but not on the smaller "no-fly" list or another list that requires secondary screening at airports.

Obama said Tuesday that Abdulmutallab should have been on a no-fly list in part because his father warned U.S. officials in Nigeria about his son in November. That information was passed on to U.S. intelligence, but it wasn't "effectively distributed," Obama said.

The CIA also was tracking someone before November called "The Nigerian," learned about through National Security Agency phone intercepts, and didn't realize that the individual was Abdulmutallab until after the bombing attempt.

One official bristled at the conjecture. The U.S. official told Fox News that the suggestion that a "magic" piece of intelligence would have shot Abdulmutallab's name to the top of the no-fly list is absurd.

One source told Fox News that the CIA, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence and the National Counterterrorism Center were all blind-sided by Obama's comments Tuesday.

CIA spokesman Paul Gimigliano also said the agency did not have the suspect's name until after his father met with U.S. embassy officials in Nigeria. He said the CIA worked with the embassy to ensure the suspect's name was in the terror database and forwarded "key biographical information" to the National Counterterrorism Center.

The State Department, too, deflected some attention on Monday, saying counterterrorism officials were the ones who decided not to revoke Abdulmutallab's visa. Spokesman Ian Kelly said that while the State Department has the authority to revoke a visa, it's not the department's responsibility. He said that after the suspect's father contacted the embassy, the warning was sent to the National Counterterrorism Center, which reviewed the case and determined there was "insufficient" evidence to take back the visa.

He said a review is nevertheless in order.

The preliminary results of an internal review are due to the president, who is on vacation in Hawaii, by Thursday.

A senior administration official, speaking with reporters on condition of anonymity, said enough had been known about the suspect to stop him, but the government didn't connect the dots.

"It is now clear to us that there were bits and pieces of information that were in the possession of the U.S. government in advance of the Christmas Day attack -- the attempted Christmas Day attack -- that had they been assessed and correlated could have led to a much broader picture and allowed us to disrupt the attack," the official said.

It's unclear how the White House intends to handle any glaring errors in the system. But Obama's remarks Tuesday were to an extent a correction to Napolitano's claim Sunday that the system worked. Napolitano clarified Monday that she was referring to agency coordination after the attempt, not before.

Napolitano's handling of the affair has made her an early target on editorial pages and from Republicans, who have long taken issue with the former Arizona governor.

"The fact that this security breach occurred in such a brazen way means that there was a level of significant incompetence involved, and I believe that rests solely on the shoulders of Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano," Burton said in a written statement. "Her bizarre remarks on Sunday were the final straw in a series of embarrassing and incompetent comments this year."
_____

Fox News' Catherine Herridge contributed to this report.
__________________
* I have the right to live, thus I have the right to defend my life from attackers who would take it from me.
* I have the right to my private property, thus I have the right to defend my property from thieves who would take it from me.
* I have the right to self-determination, thus I have the right to defend my liberty from tyrants who would take it from me.
* The only usable tools for these tasks are guns, and thus I have the right to shoot anyone who would take my guns from me.
Ought Six is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2009, 03:52 PM   #2
Ought Six
Dismember
 
Ought Six's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 35,164
Blog Entries: 15
Thanks: 171
Thanked 389 Times in 325 Posts
Arrow

Terror probe to focus on agency turf wars


Harvey Morris in New York
The Financial Times
December 30 2009


Leon Panetta, the CIA director, warned just three months ago that any actions by his agency would not “by themselves defeat terrorists determined to strike again”.

His words have been vindicated all too starkly, with Barack Obama’s admission that a “systemic” failure led to a “potentially catastrophic breach of security” in the case of the alleged Christmas day airliner attack. One focus of the investigation that the US president has ordered will be whether turf wars among agencies – rivalries that were meant to be resolved in the light of the lessons of the September 11 attacks – contributed to the breakdown.

The revelation that the CIA had a first-hand warning about the potential threat posed by Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab from his own father begs the question why the information – relayed to “a component of our intelligence community”, according to Mr Obama – was not acted on.

The intelligence failure has already generated finger-pointing among agencies responsible for US security.

The CIA, which jealously guards its primacy in intelligence operations abroad and its direct line to the White House, says the Nigerian’s details were forwarded to the National Counterterrorism Center (NCTC).

The cross-agency NCTC was established in 2004 to provide “integrated, all-purpose analysis” without which, “it is not possible to ‘connect the dots’.”

The state department, seeking to explain why the Nigerian’s 2008 multi-entry US visa was not revoked in the light of what became known about him, also appeared to pass the ball to the NCTC when Ian Kelly, its spokesman, said on Monday it was not his department’s function to revoke visas.

A state department cable from the US embassy in Nigeria alerted the intelligence community, including the NCTC, of the concerns about Mr Abdulmutallab.

But that was “insufficient for this interagency review process to make a determination that this individual’s visa should be revoked”, Mr Kelly said.

The persistence of interagency turf wars was highlighted on Wednesday by a report that the White House this month issued a classified order to try to resolve friction between Mr Panetta’s CIA and Dennis Blair, the director of national intelligence, over how the agency conducts covert operations abroad.

Mr Blair, a former naval commander who took the post in January, heads the intelligence community and acts as principal adviser on intelligence to the president.

The Los Angeles Times said the White House memo sided with Mr Panetta’s insistence that he remain in charge of naming the senior US spy in foreign posts but reminded the CIA that it must work closely with Mr Blair on sensitive operations.

Intelligence officials frequently express frustration that the public hears about their failures but rarely about their successes. They note that the Christmas day attack was the first major domestic incident in the eight years since 9/11.

Analysts nevertheless say the full lessons of 9/11 have yet to be learned. Thomas E. Copeland, a national security expert, charted the history of turf wars among rival agencies in a 2007 book and noted failings in information-sharing both between and within them.

Some analysts argue that a clearer separation between intelligence-gathering and intelligence analysis, based on the structure in the UK and elsewhere, might help to stop the nation’s guardians being buried by a plethora of raw data.
Ought Six is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2009, 04:42 PM   #3
Sysiphus
Senior Level 5
 
Sysiphus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Sammamish Plateau, WA
Posts: 5,444
Thanks: 32
Thanked 90 Times in 76 Posts
Quote:
The state department, seeking to explain why the Nigerian’s 2008 multi-entry US visa was not revoked in the light of what became known about him, also appeared to pass the ball to the NCTC when Ian Kelly, its spokesman, said on Monday it was not his department’s function to revoke visas.
This is where the clusterf--- happened. I am not as concerned that he was not put on the no fly or extra screening list, as such a decision involves a great deal of judgment. However, if someone's father comes and tells embassy officials that his own son is becoming radicalized in Yemen, the visa should be immediately pulled, no questions asked. It boggles my mind that they did not do so.
Sysiphus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2009, 07:41 PM   #4
dyrt
. . .
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 3,825
Blog Entries: 3
Thanks: 9
Thanked 136 Times in 96 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by ndriley97 View Post
This is where the clusterf--- happened. I am not as concerned that he was not put on the no fly or extra screening list, as such a decision involves a great deal of judgment. However, if someone's father comes and tells embassy officials that his own son is becoming radicalized in Yemen, the visa should be immediately pulled, no questions asked. It boggles my mind that they did not do so.
Mine too. It must have taken a lot of soul searching for that father to go to the embassy. The act of telling about his son is very serious no matter what he actually said.
dyrt is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
aftermath, attack, begins, failed, fingerpointing, terror

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.