Go Back   This Blue Marble, a Global Current Events Discussion Forum > Main Floor > Politics

Politics Step up and make your case on all manner of political topics.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 03-31-2012, 12:54 PM   #1
Ought Six
Dismember
 
Ought Six's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 35,164
Blog Entries: 15
Thanks: 178
Thanked 390 Times in 326 Posts
Arrow NC military post concert geared toward atheists

http://www.boston.com/news/nation/ar...ward_atheists/
__________________
* I have the right to live, thus I have the right to defend my life from attackers who would take it from me.
* I have the right to my private property, thus I have the right to defend my property from thieves who would take it from me.
* I have the right to self-determination, thus I have the right to defend my liberty from tyrants who would take it from me.
* The only usable tools for these tasks are guns, and thus I have the right to shoot anyone who would take my guns from me.
Ought Six is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2012, 11:26 AM   #2
CanadaSue
SuperModerator
 
CanadaSue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: In my gardens or online
Posts: 27,149
Blog Entries: 28
Thanks: 1,062
Thanked 3,377 Times in 1,905 Posts
Still sorting out how I feel about this & similar events - if/when they happen.

It never occured to me to consider that atheism and/or secularism might come in as many flavours as any religious faith. Okay - I'm guilty of unexamined atheism. I don't know if I have a specific belief SYSTEM or not. I probably do - would just have to think about it & isolate what I do believe.

But... does what I believe have anything to do with faith? Or knowledge? Does it matter?

To me atheism was always most easily described as an ABSENCE of belief. I don't believe in God - an omniscient, omnipotent, omnianything being that created the universe & guides lives & development.

That still doesn't answer WHERE exactly moral codes come from among different atheists & secularists.

And in terms of meeting times & places on base - what would a group of atheists/secularists talk about? Serious question - you have to go beyond: "I don't believe in any God." "Nope, me either." "JEb, can you pass the coffee pot - thanks!"
__________________
"Most of what you did with Ebola was go to Africa and count corpses after the fact." - CJ Peters
CanadaSue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2012, 03:02 PM   #3
Ought Six
Dismember
 
Ought Six's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 35,164
Blog Entries: 15
Thanks: 178
Thanked 390 Times in 326 Posts
Arrow

The same place all moral codes come from. The idea that moral codes come from religions is really a false meme. Religions are merely a mechanism to encode and preserve what already exists in a society. Do you think that before The Bible, no one had ever thought of the idea of 'do unto others as you would have them do unto you'? Or 'thou shalt not steal'?

The real source of moral codes is human nature itself. We are social animals, and like all social animals, we have hardwired social 'herd' behaviors that allow us to form viable social constructs. The basic unit is the family. All the larger social units are based off of this model. The next step up is the clan, then the tribe, then the fiefdom or municipality, then the nation. All of these constructs have the same basic concepts; rights and privileges, responsibilities, and authoritarian hierarchies. Look at any society at any point in human history, and you will find them. They will not be all the same, but they will have striking similarities. We are all raised by societies, and they indoctrinate us all with their moral codes. As individuals, we will have our own version of that moral code that we live by, whether we realize it or not, but the foundation comes from the society we were raised by, and/or the one we currently live in

The basic-most right is the right to life. If you and/or your family members can be killed at any moment on the whim of the leader or leadership, you are not going to stick around unless you are held there by force. Even in such harsh authoritarian societies such as feudal Japan or modern North Korea, there are rules that, if followed, allow you to live in some degree of safety. There have been societies where the rulers at the top have such unfettered authority that they can walk around killing innocents at will, but the safety there is in numbers; with so many people and so few rulers, it is very unlikely that you will be a victim. And even as a slave, it is unlikely you will be killed out of hand because your labor is a valuable commodity. Societies must provide the basics; food, shelter, and whatever. That is part of the right to life; the social contract that says, 'I will contribute to society, and you will feed me or protect me while I feed myself and others'. The herd is stronger than the individual, but only if the members of the herd follow the rules and live cooperatively.

The next most common and important right in a human social construct is property rights. If what you produce is stolen from you, you have no incentive to produce anything at all. A non-productive herd soon dies. So there must be rules that allow you to keep at least some of what you produce from your labor, and to keep the tools you use to produce the things you produce. 'Thou shalt not steal' is derived from this fundamental human social reality. When the leadership of a social unit becomes too greedy and steals too much, life becomes so hard that the herd members lose their productive incentive or simply starve. Such dysfunctional societies soon collapse, or rescue themselves by adopting a more workable social model. An incredibly strong authoritarian structure can keep such a society going for a time (like North Korea), but in the long run they will not be competitive with other freer societies that provide greater work incentives and are thus more productive.

There is much more to this whole concept; far, far more than I can cover in one post. The idea is generally referred to as natural law, and it is the social science upon which the American system of governance was built upon by our Founding Fathers and the Framers of our Constitution. Reams of books, essays, pamphlets, treatises and more have been written about this over the last millennia. The fact that modern representative democracies so well conformed to human nature is why this has been the most successful model for such large social constructs to date. The fact that we are moving away from that model towards a more authoritarian cleptocratic model is why they are now starting to fail.
__________________
* I have the right to live, thus I have the right to defend my life from attackers who would take it from me.
* I have the right to my private property, thus I have the right to defend my property from thieves who would take it from me.
* I have the right to self-determination, thus I have the right to defend my liberty from tyrants who would take it from me.
* The only usable tools for these tasks are guns, and thus I have the right to shoot anyone who would take my guns from me.
Ought Six is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
atheists, concert, geared, military, post

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.